With that said, I have a few thoughts concerning why I was a BibleWorks user instead of Logos, and a lot of it had to do with what Kevin wrote above about customer service and how the company is run. I would also just like to say that the following is just my personal experience and I know nothing further than that.
I am a prior BibleWorks user who moved to Accordance after BibleWorks went under. Want to find every time Jesus spoke about something, the search is the best (only?) way to answer the question since it will pick up pronouns that refer to Jesus.īefore I say anything else I would like to preface that I never owned Logos. I love the tagging they have done with things like pronoun antecedents. I can get all the information in Accordance, but its so quick in Logos! The folks at Faithlife are all in on tagging texts. On the other hand, Logos' Word Study tool is top notch. Accordance has the inference command, nothing like it in Logos with respect to granularity. The text command in Accordance opens up ways to query texts that simply are not possible in Logos.
For example, in working with intertextuality, Logos has a resource and tagging that identifies the quotes, allusions and inferences between the testaments. Logos tends to have database tools built from tagged texts Accordance will tend to have tools that allow you to collect your own data from their tagged text. I would also appreciate someone who might be able to explain what benefits or differences there might be for someone trying to learn to read Ancient Hebrew or Greek of the products.įor work in the original languages, Logos cannot do everything that Accordance can do (the inverse is also true BTW). If I'm missing something above, please let me know. In addition on a computer of similar power to the one running logos it has, effective, instantaneous response on searches. It also has much more focused UI, and as such is more intuitive to use. It is also a hog, such that if you do a word search the response time is measured in seconds even on an i7 8 core machine running with 32 GB of RAM and NVME SSD's.ī ) Accordance has a generally smaller library, and less direct access to a vast digital library.
BIBLEWORKS LOGOS ACCORDANCE 比較 WINDOWS
#2 Based on my own research with both, and considering that I'm on Windows and not Mac, what am I missing from a comparison if I were to boil it down to :Ī ) Logos has a much larger overall library per package (though less English Bibles, and a flashier UI capable of doing everything that Accordance Does (presuming you are willing to put in the work to build your layouts). #1 Ignoring the "worship leader" junk that Logos offers (which even if I thought was great, since I'm not an elder of leading a corporate bible study means absolutely nothing to me), What package in Accordance would be the closest approximation to the Logos Gold package. I'm not asking which one is Better (honestly I view this as the old Photography argument as Nikon vs Canon), I just have a couple of questions:
For Sake of comparison I currently have Logos Gold (Reformed Edition). I'm a layperson interested in learning Hebrew and Greek and adding Original Texts to my Study process.
BIBLEWORKS LOGOS ACCORDANCE 比較 UPGRADE
In any case I've been placed in a wonderful situation where I can upgrade one, and since earlier this year found my password for my Accordance account (and upgraded to Triple Discoverer). I've mostly done bible studies manually using my NASV Bible (1977 based on preference) I've had since College (my first Bible long since having met it's end). I'm a long term Accordance owner and Logos Owner.
0 kommentar(er)
